Media Contact

Ms. Pinchun Chou

Tel: +886-2-8978-6488 ext.669

Ms. Lindsay Hou

Tel: +886-2-8978-6488 ext.667

RSS Subscription
  NAND Flash  
  Consumer Electronics  
  Green Energy  
  Internet of Things  
  Automotive Electronics  
  Innovative Technological Applications  

Press Release

Note 7 Battery Fire Reveals Flaw in Samsung’s Supply Chain Strategy but Its Impact on Lithium Battery Industry Is Limited, Says TrendForce

Wednesday , 09 / 21 / 2016 [ Analysts: Duff Lu. ]

Battery fires linked to Samsung’s latest flagship Galaxy Note 7 has led to a major fallout in the smartphone market. “This incident exposes Samsung’s flawed strategy of allocating most of its smartphone battery orders to Samsung SDI,” said Duff Lu, research manager of EnergyTrend, division of TrendForce.

The battery defect in Note 7 will have limited short-term impact on the lithium battery industry as a whole because just that one device model is being affected. On the other hand, the incident in the long run will cause smartphone brands to rethink their strategies for battery supply chains.

“Energy density of smartphone batteries has been increasing steadily in recent years to satisfy consumers’ habits of using their devices for extended periods,” noted Lu. “While mainstream smartphone batteries now have a density of more than 680 kilowatt-hours per kilogram, some products are even developed to last longer than notebook batteries. However, the increase in energy density of lithium batteries has also led to growing concerns over their safety.”

Most smartphones and notebooks use lithium polymer batteries because they are lighter and thinner compared with other types of lithium batteries. The percentage of smartphones using polymer batteries has risen considerably since 2014 as the competition among device vendors becomes fiercer and a polymer battery supply chain has emerged in China. The increasing adoption of polymer batteries has also led to a significant reduction in the use of prismatic lithium batteries among smartphones. EnergyTrend’s data shows that the share of smartphones using lithium polymer batteries has soared from around 35% in 2011 to 70% in 2016.

According Lu, Hong Kong-based Amperex Technology (ATL) is currently the leading lithium battery supplier worldwide in terms of production capacity, followed by Sony, Samsung SDI, LG Chem (LGC) and Lishan rounding out the top five. ATL has been the most active in capacity expansion in recent years, though other China-based suppliers have continued to take on more capacities as well. South Korean battery makers by contrast will only increase their capacities if there is stable demand growth.

“Most branded device vendors allocate their battery orders evenly between two or more suppliers,” Lu pointed out. “It is a rarity to have a vendor handing over 60% of its orders to one battery maker. Apple, for instance, never allocates more than 40% of its iPhone battery orders to its largest battery supplier ATL. This effectively spreads the risks of encountering problems with product quality later on. To lower costs further, Apple in recent years has divided its battery supply chain into battery cell manufacturing and battery assembly.”

Conversely, Samsung gave more than 60% of its Note 7 battery orders to Samsung SDI. By doing so, Samsung found itself with very few options as it faces problems with product quality and safety. In the short term, Samsung will be under pressure to find alternative suppliers and rebuild its damaged reputation. The incident’s impacts on the wider lithium battery industry, however, is not as significant. In the long run, Samsung will focus on diversifying its battery supply chain. The incident also serves as a warning to other smartphone brands that they will have accept tradeoff between energy density and component cost when choosing their batteries. 

To keep updated with our press releases, please follow our social media pages. facebookGoogle+TwitterLinkin

lithium batteries lithium polymer batteries Samsung Samsung SDI ATL Apple iPhone

TrendForce Press Center Copyright Notice
TrendForce grants you a limited license to use and/or republish any of the press releases on TrendForce Press Center for any legitimate media purpose (including copying and redistributing the content of press releases in any format and via any outlets), provided that you follow these license terms:

1. Reference TrendForce as the source on your works, or include a hyperlink to the original release on the TrendForce site.
2. Do not modify any press release wording, or maliciously alter its related information. Users are subject to any civil or criminal liabilities if the information displayed in the copy or redistribution of press releases is inconsistent with the original materials on TrendForce Press Center.
3. Do not modify or add hyperlinks, including but not limited to adlinks, within the press release. The authorization of press releases on TrendForce Press Center does not grant users the right to suggest, approve or endorse their value-added derivatives on behalf of this body.

If your citations of press releases contain mistakes and/or have information missing, TrendForce may, in its sole discretion, direct you to remove the content distributed via TrendForce from your site at any time and for any reason, and you agree to comply with such request.